The Great Reset: Impact of the pandemic on climate change and other environmental policies

It didn’t take long for some people to figure out that this was the real agenda behind the lockdowns and policies being put into place during the pandemic. News stories continue to role out talking about the clean air and water that happened during the lockdown. Some of these articles even call for lockdowns to help with climate change because of the effects we have already seen on the planet. There are two very important pieces of information that these reporters leave out. The earth grew hotter by .5 degrees in 2020, the largest spike in temperature for a single year. We also know the same thing happened the days following 9-11-2001 with airliners being grounded for a week. With cleaner air comes a warmer planet. I’m not saying we should pollute more, but it would appear that the only thing holding back rapid global warming is the same pollution that is causing much of it. At this point human existence is a double-edged sword. If we try to clean up our act with carbon emissions and air pollution, we speed up the warming of the planet. If we continue on as normal, we face a slow terminal disease that will eventually kill us.

There is a man named Guy McPherson who started to speak about human extinction in 2010. Oddly enough his prediction for a terminal planet appears to fit the timeline that Klaus Schwab and the UN are following with the Great Reset and Agenda 2030. Guy doesn’t see humanity making it past the year 2030 because of climate change and the eventual loss of environment needed for human life. I don’t know if the UN or the world economic forum are listening to Guy, but it would appear that they received the same information at some point. Could the Great Reset be a last-ditch effort to save mankind? If so, why would the creators be so selfish as to add in their own social agenda of identity politics and communist policies?

As I write this Biden, Macron, Trudeau, and Boris Johnson have signed bills making 30% of the land in their country’s untouchable wild lands. This policy is in agreement with the UN’s Agenda 21, started in 1992. Along with the preservation of land comes the phasing out of gasoline automobiles. The UK already set a deadline for the year 2030, which most experts admit is an impossible task. The Biden administration is also set to make a plan for 2030 regarding automobiles. Fracking was already halted on Federal land and already gasoline is 75 cents higher than it was last year. In two months, the US went from the number one producer of oil to number 5. While we were energy independent, we are set to import more oil than we export in 2021, and the countries we are buying from have people in the streets screaming death to America. Meanwhile, with Biden as president gasoline will continue to rise as Russia and Saudi Arabia continue to keep their production down to raise the price of oil per barrel putting pain on the US consumer who has to fill their gas tank to go to work. The current administration will not care about this considering that gasoline cars will not exist by policy in 2030. The cost of this change will be passed onto the consumer who will not be able to afford it. What is not being taken into account with these new policies eliminating combustion engines is the amount of oil that goes into the production of a car regardless of what it runs on. There are seven gallons of oil per tire on a car. The plastics used throughout the car including most of the body. Shipping parts to various facilities in the assembly process. Transporting the cars to dealerships. The transportation of materials for the productions of the car. The list goes on and on for how much oil goes into the production of an automobile. We can’t pretend that they don’t know this. They don’t want us to own cars anymore. The experiment of the automobile, or horseless carriage, is coming to a close and its not an extinction of its own choosing. There are 800 million cars on the roads of the world and we can not change the fuel source or motors of these vehicles to run on anything else.

Two years ago, AOC introduced the green new deal, a plan to completely eliminate carbon emissions in the US. This plan was dramatic and would cost $93 trillion dollars if it was implemented. It would also eliminate the airline industry, which means that any place relying on tourism would be dead. Nobody would be allowed to go anywhere. International trade would die. In the end the planet would die as well because of the loss of aerosols in the air reflecting light back and cooling the planet enough to sustain life. It would appear that the ultimate goal of the Great Reset, the green new deal, and agenda 2030 is to create a feedback loop of worse environmental conditions that they would have to fix and in doing so making matters worse. It’s the usual pattern of needy people, create problem, fix problem that creates bigger problem, repeat. The climate is not what appears to be the problem, it’s the people in charge.

Standard

Children of Men

Guy McPherson, climate change believer and doomsday enthusiast might be correct. For years, Guy has pushed the idea that even if we lower carbon emissions and stop polluting the earth will still heat up from the lack of reflecting particles in the air. In Guy’s opinion the concept of climate change is a damned if you do, damned if you don’t problem. Either way humanity is screwed.

This isn’t a popular opinion and not a message that people will pay attention to. Considering how the other fighters of climate change act in their role of saving the planet should we really be surprised? John Kerry flew a private jet to Iceland to accept an award for combating climate change. Leonardo DiCaprio not only flies himself all over the planet in the name of climate change but also which ever woman half his age he is currently indulging in. Al Gore owns several pieces of property, a personal jet, and his carbon footprint is larger than some cities. Add the fact that many of these millionaires and billionaires are investing in beach front property and that should tell you everything.

https://www.healio.com/news/primary-care/20210129/covid19-reduces-fertility-in-men-study-suggests

 A recent study found that men who were infected with Covid-19 have a lower fertility rate than normal. Over the decades, studies have found lowering levels of testosterone in men due to environmental circumstances. Estrogen in the water supply from birth control pills, diets with less meat and fat, soy products, plastics, and car exhaust are just a few of the causes. This study shows a drastic decrease in sperm count after being infected with Covid-19 and it is unknown how much this will affect fertility in the future. We could literally be looking at Children of Men in real life.

Standard